as much to women fond of breasts, although I imagine a fair bit of boob envy can occur between women, as well.
That raises an interesting point. For a lot of guys, the size of the boobs is a big part of how attractive they are. My guess is that the more boob there is, the more of the goodness there is. Simple as “more to love”. The upper limit on size appreciation gets triggered when they no longer look possible, impinging on the “biologically fit” arguments. Can't really propagate the species well with freakshows.
Back to “lumps of fat”. It's really the word “lumps” that
I have a problem with. Very little is pleasantly lumpy. Fat,
on the other hand, isn't such a downer. There are those, of
|
course, that like their ladies larger,
but more generally, fat is a sign of health. Yes, excess is
excess, but meat on the bones is a good thing, giving the
impression of nourishment and vitality. Fat in food isn't
bad either, as proponents of the failed low-fat diet approach
would have you believe. It's good and natural for any carnivore,
essential to survival to consume. So if you insist on pointing
out their fatty ways, do so without the tone of disdain. I
love them because they're lumps of fat. Perfect, round, smooth,
soft lumps of fat.
Discuss this article
|
|
